Illegear RAVEN SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIllegear RAVEN SE  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200903
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateSep 05 '23 at 19:44
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 192
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 520
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1085) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 53.2
Parallax 8
5% 22.4 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 512GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 393 341 341 346 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 1,134
Mixed 369
SusWrite 368
133% 585 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 32.7
135% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 635
DQ Mixed 770
482% 521 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 267%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16G3200CL22 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.3% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 50 120 15.5" 1280 720 BOE08E8
Typical RAVEN SE Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Illegear RAVEN SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback