Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 05 '23 at 13:25
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 59
1-Core 89
2-Core 167
59% 105 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 336
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 53.8
Parallax 19.9
12% 29.4 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 15
Splatting 13.9
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 960GB
639GB free
Firmware: P220214b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 113 118 410 355 354 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 413
Write 416
Mixed 361
SusWrite 283
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 33.3
117% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 195
153% 212 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 100%
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 948 954 989 967 843 838 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 954
Write 1,024
Mixed 918
SusWrite 923
216% 955 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 40.6
131% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 505
369% 480 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 156%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK Kingston KF2666C15S4/16G 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 18.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 0P 1R 4G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 18% 91 246 178 144 15.5" 1536 793 NCP004D
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback