Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_F1500EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_F1500EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515EA
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221110
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 05 '23 at 13:03
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 65.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 228
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 506
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 15CC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.29% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 13.9
9% 11.9 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 9.4
10% 12 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.29%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1032 512GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11111000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1052 901 948 977 1006 1005 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,438
Write 1,776
Mixed 1,558
SusWrite 981
325% 1,438 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 43.1
170% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 748
DQ Write 594
DQ Mixed 641
488% 661 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 199%
Great: 246%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 117 114 118 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 130
Write 106
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 116
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.8
223% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 17.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 15.1
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1536 793 AUO61ED
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_F1500EA Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_F1500EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback