| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141202 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 05 '23 at 11:00 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.3%
Above average
|
52% 81.4 Pts
|
30% 230 Pts
|
17% 270 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.5%
Average
|
48% 67.4 fps
|
47% 59.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S4200102
|
44% 196 MB/s
|
121% 38.8 MB/s
|
38% 51.3 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
129GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 111 112 110 110 MB/s
|
92%
Outstanding
|
79% 108 MB/s
|
132% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate FreeAgent Go 250GB
18GB free, PID 2101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 25 25 24 MB/s
|
12.8%
Very poor
|
35% 29.1 MB/s
|
24% 0.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46%
Average
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
26% 9.23 GB/s
|
48% 84.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 60 | 7.2" | 1920 1137 | SAM03E8 SyncMaster |
Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,867 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 513x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 326x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 186x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 91x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $171 |