Default XU133IR200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDefault XU133IR200  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display3000 x 2000 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '23 at 21:48
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 218
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 458
44% 365 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 8.3
0% 6.33 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S201 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 309
Write 320
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 19.5
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 74.1
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 0.7
52% 118 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 28.9
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 22.3
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 13.5" 1280 720 MEI96A2 TDM13O56
Typical XU133IR200 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Default XU133IR200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback