Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '23 at 04:34
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 55.9
1-Core 14
2-Core 45.3
27% 38.4 Pts
4-Core 45.5
8-Core 45.6
6% 45.5 Pts
64-Core 50.4
3% 50.4 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8470D
AMD(1002 0123) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.99% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 3.6
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.99%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 226 293 322 268 398 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 249
Write 255
Mixed 247
SusWrite 291
59% 260 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 15.2
50% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 92.9
DQ Mixed 97.9
74% 100 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16JTF1G64AZ-1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.2% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 8.6
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 84 56 60 24" 1920 1017 BNQ78A6 BenQ GL2450H
Typical GA-F2A78M-HD2 Builds (Compare 249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback