Lenovo 7033A1G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemLenovo 7033A1G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime25.2 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 18:14
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 80
2-Core 143
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 231
36% 258 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 31.6
29% 33.4 fps
MRender 33.8
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 22.8
24% 30 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XD0R00V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 40 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.9% Very poor
Read 160
Write 37.5
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 36.6
16% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 6.1
30% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 50.2
DQ Write 55.4
DQ Mixed 64.8
46% 56.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GR1333D364L9/8G Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 14.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 29 60 23" 1920 1017 HWP3064 HP E231
Typical 7033A1G Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 7033A1G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback