Asus CM6650

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CM6650  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6650
Memory2.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110509
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 15:51
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 93
2-Core 177
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 408
43% 342 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530
Asus(1043 839B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.57 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 334 333 346 357 303 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 382
Write 362
Mixed 340
SusWrite 330
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 36
117% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 37.5
DQ Write 96
DQ Mixed 54
45% 62.5 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 75%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
1TB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 84 84 86 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
45% Average
Read 71.7
Write 71.5
Mixed 45.4
SusWrite 84.9
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLZ302G08-MDJHB 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23" 1280 720 HKC2160
Typical CM6650 Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback