Gigabyte Z370P D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370P D3
MotherboardGigabyte Z370P D3  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 12:36
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 233
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 731
67% 562 Pts
64-Core 1,181
73% 1,181 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 377F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.4% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 108
Parallax 101
84% 104 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 98.5
Splatting 96.5
79% 96.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0C-00AJM0 480GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 231800WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 577 237 238 239 243 240 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,401
Write 1,400
Mixed 1,137
SusWrite 296
237% 1,058 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 49.5
161% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 688
DQ Write 397
DQ Mixed 580
422% 555 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 148%
Great: 226%
Plextor M3 128GB
82GB free
Firmware: 1.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 220 220 204 220 216 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 435
Write 220
Mixed 226
SusWrite 216
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 27.4
96% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 172
151% 227 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 87%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$56
179GB free
Firmware: UF300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 134 107 104 135 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 409
Write 279
Mixed 272
SusWrite 130
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 15.6
64% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 87.3
DQ Mixed 43.1
48% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 55%
Spcc Solid State Disk 60GB
55GB free
Firmware: 20150213
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 429
Write 78.7
Mixed 106
SusWrite 79.2
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 8.2
68% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 79.8
DQ Mixed 55.3
53% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 70%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
108GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 80 81 82 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 81
Write 84.9
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 82.8
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH 859B CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
65.3% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 19.9
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 18.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 24" 1280 720 AOC2460 2460G4
Typical GA-Z370P D3-CF Builds (Compare 7,345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370P D3 - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $545
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback