Micro F7BSC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive443% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro F7BSC  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BSC
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 06:53
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 75.5
1-Core 203
2-Core 385
115% 221 Pts
4-Core 775
8-Core 1,388
130% 1,081 Pts
64-Core 1817
112% 1817 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
Nvidia(10DE 14B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 230
Reflection 220
Parallax 202
187% 217 fps
MRender 256
Gravity 157
Splatting 131
142% 181 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 158%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
565GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3627 3624 2185 1270 1257 1263 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
443% Outstanding
Read 3,834
Write 3,711
Mixed 2,571
SusWrite 2,204
691% 3,080 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 85.5
282% 99.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,635
DQ Write 1,392
DQ Mixed 1,536
1,145% 1,521 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 443%
Great: 537%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
1TB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 680 790 778 790 798 802 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 679
Write 435
Mixed 546
SusWrite 773
137% 608 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 38.9
128% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 0.2
74% 179 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 126%
Great: 303%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD56S46BS8HA-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
162% Outstanding
MC Read 55.9
MC Write 63.7
MC Mixed 53.1
164% 57.6 GB/s
SC Read 51.6
SC Write 74.6
SC Mixed 55.3
173% 60.5 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 162%
Great: 162%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 65" 1280 720 PHL01EA Philips FTV
Typical F7BSC Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Micro F7BSC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback