Medion Erazer X5329 F/B620

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	Medion Erazer X5329 F/B620 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION MS-7848
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150717
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '23 at 17:51
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Memory 79.7 1-Core 89.4 2-Core 144 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 189 24% 182 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 537.13 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.3% Average	Lighting 58.9 Reflection 60.9 Parallax 62.1 48% 60.6 fps	MRender 60.2 Gravity 62.9 Splatting 57.4 49% 60.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03210001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 358 371 46 31 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 427 Write 374 Mixed 295 SusWrite 184 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 46.3 4K Mixed 30.9 103% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 127 103% 145 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 126GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 180 179 177 176 181 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 149 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 178 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 2x8GB 842 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 16.8 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 15.7 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	49	14	60	23.5"	1920 1080	ACI249A ASUS VS247

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer X5329 F/B620 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: Medion Erazer X5329 F/B620

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	2x

SSD
MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 48%, 1,148 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x

RAM
M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 54%, 842 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $333

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16