Eluktronics MAX-17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemEluktronics MAX-17  (all builds)
MotherboardEluktronics MAX-17
Memory53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210520
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateSep 02 '23 at 04:18
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 71.9
1-Core 163
2-Core 323
98% 186 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 1,014
100% 820 Pts
64-Core 1,255
78% 1,255 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Device(1D05 1111) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.10.18
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 26.1
Reflection 182
Parallax 35.1
21% 81.2 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 28.4
Splatting 23.6
19% 22.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD BLACK SDBPNTZ-2T00-1106 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1382 1115 851 810 850 834 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,642
Write 1589
Mixed 1,301
SusWrite 974
309% 1,376 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 54.7
189% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 495
DQ Mixed 1,082
710% 848 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 216%
Great: 323%
MANIX4000GB-G4SS 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EGFM52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1519 1633 1657 1479 531 307 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,312
Write 1,627
Mixed 1,364
SusWrite 1,187
310% 1,373 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 67.9
222% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,056
DQ Write 577
DQ Mixed 1,167
774% 933 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 230%
Great: 466%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 28
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 0P 5R 10G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
58% 55% 33 214 60 165 17.2" 1707 960 BOE0977
History: Score 49: 0P 5R 7G 3B | Score 58: 0P 5R 10G 3B
Typical MAX-17 Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Eluktronics MAX-17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback