Machenike L16P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMachenike L16P  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHENIKE L16P
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 01 '23 at 21:44
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 44.5
1-Core 193
2-Core 358
99% 199 Pts
4-Core 644
8-Core 1,065
104% 855 Pts
64-Core 1,585
98% 1,585 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1295) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3713
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 146
Parallax 131
133% 147 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 110
Splatting 90.3
103% 132 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 118%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KPEGYMTBW2M512GCJD 512GB
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1215288e
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 364 318 314 294 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 477
Write 414
Mixed 366
SusWrite 326
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 17.5
71% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 836
DQ Write 380
DQ Mixed 685
488% 634 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 329%
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 935 1037 1017 1488 1477 1451 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,431
Write 821
Mixed 1,103
SusWrite 1234
257% 1,147 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 37.5
172% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 901
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 732
512% 658 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 212%
Great: 394%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.7
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 14.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 165 16" 1280 720 BOE09FE
Typical L16P Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO

System: Machenike L16P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback