Zoostorm 7200-2048A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemZoostorm 7200-2048A  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H81M-S2V
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150930
Uptime7 Days
Run DateSep 01 '23 at 18:24
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 179
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 300
38% 290 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Palit(1569 1184) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
35.9% Below average
Lighting 41.9
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 54.6
34% 45.3 fps
MRender 55.8
Gravity 48.7
Splatting 41.9
39% 48.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Teclast 128GB S550 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 273 276 293 292 294 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 317
Write 282
Mixed 164
SusWrite 271
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 12.5
95% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 62.1
87% 155 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 85%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
711GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 152 152 153 152 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 131
Write 146
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 152
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 108%
FSS SSD 17TB
15.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 51.7
Write 12.5
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 11.9
24% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
74% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 18.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 17" 1280 720 PHL082F Philips 190S
Typical 7200-2048A Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Zoostorm 7200-2048A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $194
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback