Asus PRIME B350-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '23 at 00:04
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 66.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 216
70% 129 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 630
65% 525 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$230
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.6% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 116
Parallax 87.3
82% 102 fps
MRender 84.8
Gravity 72.8
Splatting 65
60% 74.2 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
69GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 204 203 251 259 260 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 454
Mixed 442
SusWrite 238
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 47.4
156% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 180
184% 300 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 123%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,372
Write 2,088
Mixed 1,467
439% 1,976 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 74.9
254% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 887
DQ Write 737
DQ Mixed 795
600% 806 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 568GB
62GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 23 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 155
Write 150
Mixed 95.9
SusWrite 22.3
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 66%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 172GB
22GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 23 22 21 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 179
Write 158
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 22.8
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 59%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 54GB
27GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 23 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 134
Write 135
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 22.3
71% 96 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 108%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 75GB
17GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 21 22 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 157
Write 164
Mixed 92
SusWrite 22.8
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.1% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 25.8
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 24" 1280 720 IVM6113 PLE2483H
Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $92

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $443
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback