Asus P5QL PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5QL PRO  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090701
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateJun 12 '22 at 19:06
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 62.1
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 82
39% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 155
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Sapphire(174B E104) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.01% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 11
Parallax 6.6
8% 9 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 7.4
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.01%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 63 75 55 17 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 55.1
Write 63.8
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 43.5
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 77%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 75GB
19GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.1 7.4 7.3 7.3 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 45.2
Write 45.9
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 7.3
25% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 59%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 10GB
9GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7 7.4 7.3 7.3 7.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.6% Very poor
Read 43.3
Write 44.7
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 7.2
24% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 2.9
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5QL PRO Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QL PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback