Corsair ONE i160

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemCorsair ONE i160  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star Z370I C2018 (MS-7B43)
Memory10.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210608
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 31 '23 at 16:46
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 283
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 932
89% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,368
85% 1,368 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3711) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 214
Reflection 207
Parallax 239
174% 220 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 206
Splatting 155
162% 205 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 156%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1447 1141 1032 931 873 832 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2,298
Write 1,958
Mixed 2,005
SusWrite 1,043
409% 1,826 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 65.1
212% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 802
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 690
505% 666 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 251%
Great: 435%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
494GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 917 508 510 380 637 508 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 136%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
420GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 79 79 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 76.5
Write 66.6
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 79
84% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4B16G7L2666A16K2-O 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 26.7
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 26.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 0R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 33% 18 489 374 165 31.5" 2560 1440 GSM776F LG ULTRAGEAR
History: Score 26: 0P 3R 1G 8B | Score 10: 0P 0R 2G 4B
Typical ONE i160 Builds (Compare 115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

System: Corsair ONE i160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $846
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback