PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B86 |
Motherboard | MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86) (all builds) |
Memory | 11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210203 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 31 '23 at 02:57 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
76.5%
Very good
|
84% 154 Pts
|
73% 615 Pts
|
66% 1,060 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 960-$198
HP(103C 2B4D) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.1%
Below average
|
32% 40.3 fps
|
29% 36 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 38 41 36 3.5 46 MB/s
|
26.9%
Poor
|
29% 135 MB/s
|
29% 6.97 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
25GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 106 110 110 117 112 MB/s
|
54.8%
Above average
|
62% 84.3 MB/s
|
18% 0.23 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
23GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 144 142 143 145 MB/s
|
76.3%
Very good
|
84% 115 MB/s
|
64% 0.57 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
27GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 179 184 179 183 183 MB/s
|
83.8%
Excellent
|
88% 120 MB/s
|
34% 0.37 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C17 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
74.1%
Very good
|
76% 26.6 GB/s
|
66% 23.2 GB/s
|
43% 92.8 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 66 | 52 | 60 | 22" | 1280 720 | ACR0009 Acer X223W |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $78Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 3,035x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 814x |
Ryzen 5 3600XAMD $190Bench 84%, 294,959 samples | 733x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $271Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 575x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 541x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $256Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 429x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $469 |