Dell OptiPlex SFF 7010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex SFF 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex SFF 7010  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '23 at 00:15
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500-$228
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 62.2
1-Core 193
2-Core 380
108% 212 Pts
4-Core 742
8-Core 1258
122% 1,000 Pts
64-Core 2,057
127% 2,057 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 101%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Dell(1028 0BD2) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3302
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
8.12% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 10.2
8% 11.1 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 10.3
9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.12%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2539
Write 2,291
Mixed 1,794
491% 2,208 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 94
318% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,505
DQ Write 1,133
DQ Mixed 1,286
971% 1,308 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Sabrent AS2115 256GB
139GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 290
Write 322
Mixed 235
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 15.1
51% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 77.9
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 128
94% 120 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4ATF1G64AZ-3G2B1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70.1% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 23.7
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 16.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1920 1080 DELA072 DELL E2211H
Typical OptiPlex SFF 7010 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex SFF 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback