Dell Vostro 15 3515

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Vostro 15 3515  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0GPGNJ
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230503
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 23:56
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 39.7
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 127
44% 80 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 363
38% 303 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Dell(1028 0AB5) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.28
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.4% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 4.4
2% 3.37 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.4%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Im2p33f3a NVMe ADATA 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 92202171 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 123 192 387 158 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 908
Write 654
Mixed 246
SusWrite 202
111% 503 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 7.8
50% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 70.7
DQ Mixed 188
134% 177 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 176%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 136 140 139 140 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 138
Write 142
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 139
144% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD4S320038G22-B 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.6% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.6
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 5 123 58 60 15.5" 1536 864 CMN15E5
Typical Vostro 15 3515 Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Vostro 15 3515

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback