Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive373% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 17:46
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$170
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 71.9
1-Core 203
2-Core 390
114% 222 Pts
4-Core 750
8-Core 1,269
123% 1,009 Pts
64-Core 1,790
111% 1,790 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 106%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Gigabyte(1458 40CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
133% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 166
Parallax 156
151% 169 fps
MRender 218
Gravity 132
Splatting 114
122% 155 fps
Poor: 121%
This bench: 133%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Viper VPR400 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.6A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1711 2799 3226 3528 3539 2752 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
373% Outstanding
Read 1,964
Write 2,563
Mixed 1,744
SusWrite 2926
521% 2,299 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 60.8
259% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 1420
DQ Mixed 315
400% 673 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 373%
Great: 373%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
465GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 482 486 485 485 383 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 348
Write 362
Mixed 332
SusWrite 465
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 30.6
134% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 343
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST2000DM009-2G4100 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: DN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 186 185 185 185 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 132
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 185
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
241% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
465GB free
Firmware: GS2OA230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 114 114 113 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 115
Write 100
Mixed 26
SusWrite 114
64% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.42312H.004 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
154% Outstanding
MC Read 62.5
MC Write 61.9
MC Mixed 56.5
172% 60.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 47
SC Mixed 28
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 147%
This bench: 154%
Great: 188%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 59 144 27" 1280 720 MSI3CA9 MSI G27C4
Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS Builds (Compare 818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 265%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 292%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,095
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback