Onda A68V+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemOnda A68V+  (all builds)
MotherboardOnda A68V+
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 16:32
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7480 Radeon R5, 8 Compute Cores 2C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Memory 33.8
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 76.6
34% 57.6 Pts
4-Core 80.4
8-Core 76.1
11% 78.2 Pts
64-Core 74.8
5% 74.8 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
AMD(1002 1E60) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 10.1
5% 7.57 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 6.7
5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ae100 120GB 120GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 231 92 79 84 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 301
Write 175
Mixed 184
SusWrite 128
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 19.9
73% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 156
124% 172 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WHALEKOM DDR3 8GB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 233
17% 233 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 10 60 27" 1280 720 DELA1D8 DELL S2722QC
Typical A68V+ Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Onda A68V+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback