TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '20 at 17:04
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 462
61% 458 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 86.3%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0162) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ae100 120GB 120GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 78 58 44 61 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 419
Write 245
Mixed 219
SusWrite 65
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 14.5
26% 9.23 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 24.8
31% 58.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 33.3%
 Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
109GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 188 176 188 192 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 162
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 185
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 110%
 Great: 112%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
50GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42% Average
Read 70.5
Write 47.9
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 75.5
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 42%
 Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ZEUS-1600 04CD F3-2400C10-4GTX 04EF ZEUS-1600 04CD F3-2400C10-4GTX 16GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.4% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 22.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19.8
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 68.4%
 Great: 69%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $159

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel  $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples1,538x
Core i7-3770KIntel  $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples955x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples563x
GPU
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples312x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples274x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples238x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples175x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples141x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples107x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples91x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples86x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples81x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback