Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB
DisplayЦвета: 800 x 1280 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 15:50
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 33.4
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 113
38% 68.9 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 209
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 3.9
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 4.9
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Shiji 2TB 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0324B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 262 313 322 325 360 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 350
Write 300
Mixed 294
SusWrite 314
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 13.6
70% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 33.7
87% 181 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 4x3GB
4 of 8 slots used
12GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.1% Above average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 21.5
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 11.8
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 236
17% 236 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 61 0" 1280 720 MS_0001
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback