MSI MS-16R4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 9SCXR
MotherboardMSI MS-16R4  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200421
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 13:39
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 216
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 578
62% 492 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 12BD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3118
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Lighting 48.5
Reflection 52.7
Parallax 45.9
40% 49 fps
MRender 52.9
Gravity 44.9
Splatting 42.1
38% 46.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE110S 256GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111B1L
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,415
Write 1001
Mixed 849
241% 1,088 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 23.7
162% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 731
DQ Write 602
DQ Mixed 113
235% 482 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 191%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
686GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 87 89 88 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 49.2
Write 81.2
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 84.6
50% 68 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.3
120% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 95%
WD Elements 500GB
52GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 6 0 4.5 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
9.02% Terrible
Read 50.3
Write 11.5
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 7.7
20% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.02%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 8A76 LD4AS008G-H2666G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.4% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 22.1
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22.5
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.7" 1280 720 LGD05E5
Typical MS-16R4 Builds (Compare 2,972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback