HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8615
Memory2.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191115
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 00:52
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 144
50% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 211
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 6 Graphics
HP(103C 8615) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
5.54% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 10.5
5% 7.13 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 8
Splatting 10.6
8% 8.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.54%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT24H3Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 384
Write 315
Mixed 348
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 24.4
84% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 175
138% 191 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 104%
WDS100T3G0A-00NA50 1TB
810GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 313
Write 82.2
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 1.6
21% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
29% 6.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Adata AO1P26KC8T1-BXPS 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15FD
Typical Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx Builds (Compare 684 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback