Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '23 at 17:17
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 125
57% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 338
33% 272 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 31.5
20% 27.4 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 24.1
20% 24.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 206 45 169 149 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
232GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 130 131 131 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 137
Write 122
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 131
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 90 98 108 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 28.2
Write 79
Mixed 79
SusWrite 99.6
53% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
252GB free, PID 61b7
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 74 74 76 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 50.7
Write 67.8
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 75.4
93% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
172% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 12
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 23.5" 1280 720 ACI24F4 ASUS 24T1E
Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback