PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
Graphics | 49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B450-PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20230616 |
Uptime | 2.3 Days |
Run Date | Aug 29 '23 at 14:08 |
Run Duration | 192 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
104%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 166 161 152 141 133 MB/s
|
80.3%
Excellent
|
|||
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N1 4TB
736GB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 109 110 107 109 MB/s
|
23.7%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N1 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 147 146 145 145 MB/s
|
35%
Below average
|
|||
49.3%
Average
|
||||
WD My Book 1140 2TB
2TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 80 80 83 84 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
Generic External 2TB
948GB free, PID 1240
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
85.6%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 71 | 60 | 165 | 31.5" | 1280 720 | GBT3200 G32QC |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 1,074x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 930x |
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 390x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 336x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 299x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 247x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $487 |