Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 29 '23 at 08:02
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 290
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 966
93% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,085
67% 1,085 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 66
Parallax 89.4
54% 73.9 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 48.9
51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,550
Write 1,948
Mixed 1,064
409% 1,854 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 64.8
209% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,055
DQ Write 827
DQ Mixed 907
688% 930 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
332GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 452 452 442 411 417 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 455
Mixed 412
SusWrite 438
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 45.1
147% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 305
244% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
257GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 115 118 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 108
Write 35
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 119
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
193% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 75%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 116 113 115 114 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 112
Write 115
Mixed 70
SusWrite 113
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 84%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 233 233 231 234 229 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 240
Write 236
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 232
147% 201 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.8
380% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 136%
Great: 136%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 50.2
Write 34.4
Mixed 29
SusWrite 36.8
49% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
92% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C16 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 47.4
MC Mixed 36.4
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 48.8
SC Mixed 33.9
101% 35.2 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 119%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27C3 MX279
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,801 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $172

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback