Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 227%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 252%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics219% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive413% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 29 '23 at 06:51
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 77.4
1-Core 184
2-Core 369
109% 210 Pts
4-Core 722
8-Core 1,311
122% 1,016 Pts
64-Core 2170
134% 2170 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 106%
Great: 115%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4577
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
8.27% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 10.8
8% 11.5 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 9.8
9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.27%
Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Lighting 327
Reflection 304
Parallax 377
266% 336 fps
MRender 360
Gravity 261
Splatting 192
213% 271 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 219%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2153 2065 2076 2043 1974 2050 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
413% Outstanding
Read 2,860
Write 3156
Mixed 2,853
SusWrite 2,060
616% 2,732 MB/s
4K Read 78
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 111
363% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,445
DQ Write 1,252
DQ Mixed 1,260
968% 1,319 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 413%
Great: 477%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
175GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 182 81 83 82 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 470
Mixed 430
SusWrite 165
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 44.7
148% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 335
252% 339 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
38GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 491
Write 472
Mixed 393
101% 452 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 47.5
157% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 336
253% 340 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Intel HBRPEKNX0101A 256GB
52GB free
Firmware: G003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 37 28 29 28 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 768
Write 453
Mixed 507
SusWrite 62.3
99% 448 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 70.2
262% 97 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 440
DQ Mixed 213
189% 274 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 129%
Great: 150%
Intel HBRPEKNX0101AO 14GB
13GB free
Firmware: K5110440
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 170 170 168 169 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 816
Write 166
Mixed 274
SusWrite 170
78% 356 MB/s
4K Read 197
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 121
498% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 890
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 278
269% 448 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 217%
Great: 217%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3467 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 40
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 43.4
SC Mixed 30.8
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 0 32" 1280 720 MTC0B01 MTC26T42
Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4 Builds (Compare 4,995 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $876
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback