Biostar H510MHP 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar H510MHP 2.0  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 28 '23 at 21:50
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 137
2-Core 276
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 898
87% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,264
78% 1,264 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 145E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.4% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 58.7
48% 58.4 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 45.9
43% 53.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD_2.5"_TLC_1TB_InnovationIT 1TB
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 233 182 172 31 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 498
Write 415
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 172
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 0.9
62% 143 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Silicon Power Computer & Communications 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 28.9
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 25.4
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 120 24" 1280 720 LHC2360 M24-FHD-165-C
Typical H510MHP 2.0 Builds (Compare 313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Biostar H510MHP 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback