Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210208
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '23 at 23:40
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 23,588 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 120 2-Core 221 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 405 8-Core 591 62% 498 Pts	64-Core 602 37% 602 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1AB1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.84% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 64.4 Parallax 7 5% 25.8 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 6 Splatting 11.9 8% 9.3 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.84% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 256GB 2,376 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: ABXA4102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 251 182 181 255 253 MB/s Performing below potential (41^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67% Good	Read 199 Write 214 Mixed 177 SusWrite 224 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 65.4 4K Mixed 30.9 104% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 222 186% 269 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 95%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 562GB free Firmware: M3CR043 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 243 210 348 445 440 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Read 70.8 Write 91.7 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 317 28% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.M8FRS Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 16GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.3% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 20.7 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 26.8 SC Mixed 22.8 62% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
6%	4%	49	198	29	60	15.5"	1536 864	BOE097D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 2,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples	993x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	800x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	353x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,090x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,056x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	762x
Micron_2200V_MTF 512GBNvmeBench 152%, 896 samples	333x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	214x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	563x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	306x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	107x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16