Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412FAC
Memory11.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200717
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateAug 27 '23 at 19:10
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 176
62% 111 Pts
4-Core 32.5
8-Core 315
16% 174 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1DE1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.75% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.8
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 0.3
2% 3.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.75%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 236 55 72 36 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 982
Write 743
Mixed 648
SusWrite 99.2
137% 618 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 35.6
134% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 310
211% 255 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATE51264HZ-2G6E1 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 20GB
2800, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 6.1
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 29 60 14" 1280 720 BOE07F6
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback