Asus PRIME Z270-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-P  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 27 '23 at 18:08
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$247
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 86.6
1-Core 129
2-Core 252
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 692
69% 561 Pts
64-Core 694
43% 694 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S5 1TB
875GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 965 1017 1029 1033 1030 1017 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,885
Write 964
Mixed 904
SusWrite 1,015
265% 1,192 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 42.9
154% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 484
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 613
464% 614 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 212%
Great: 284%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
488GB free
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 469 344 235 235 235 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 368
Write 437
Mixed 349
SusWrite 328
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 35.6
125% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 316
240% 323 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 98%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
23GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 305 307 306 306 316 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 311
Write 294
Mixed 276
SusWrite 314
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 50.9
167% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 203 204 203 204 204 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 79.4
Write 137
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 204
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
364% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
364GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 164 164 163 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 130
Write 113
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 163
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
160GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 9.1 6.2 6 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 67.3
Write 64.9
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 25
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 23.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 59 60 0" 1280 720
Typical PRIME Z270-P Builds (Compare 6,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-P - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $810
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback