Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Provence-5R1
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '23 at 17:00
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 191
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 277
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39D1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3713
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Lighting 30.8
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 31.2
25% 30.5 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 20
23% 29 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1866 825 611 615 615 379 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1992
Write 1809
Mixed 1,333
SusWrite 818
333% 1,488 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 66.6
217% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 865
DQ Write 706
DQ Mixed 795
593% 789 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 232%
Great: 340%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 128 127 129 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 112
Write 121
Mixed 52
SusWrite 127
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.1
112% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Kingston KHX2666C15S4/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 22.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 21.7
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO61ED
Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 6,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback