Asrock A320M-HD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '23 at 16:31
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 99%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9500E APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
33.2% Below average
Memory 56.6
1-Core 43.9
2-Core 54.1
35% 51.5 Pts
4-Core 58.8
8-Core 61.9
8% 60.3 Pts
64-Core 67.6
4% 67.6 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 145E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.8% Below average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 56
Parallax 49.5
39% 51 fps
MRender 61.6
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 44.7
42% 52 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 53 49 51 41 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 21.7
Write 89.3
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 50.8
36% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 112%
WD WD800BD-22MRA1 80GB
19GB free
Firmware: 10.01E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 41 40 37 39 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 42.7
Write 42.5
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 39.6
29% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HTH5AN8G6NCJR-VKD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 6.8
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 1.1
SC Mixed 1.9
3% 1.13 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 2R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 15% 53 168 29 60 23.8" 1920 1080 SAM7094 LF24T450F
Typical A320M-HD Builds (Compare 728 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback