MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C89
MotherboardMSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '21 at 21:02
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G6400
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 228
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 353
47% 351 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
MSI(1462 7C89) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 4.1
3% 3.2 fps
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 0.3
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD NTC 120GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0317A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 115 129 98 38 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 368
Write 364
Mixed 303
SusWrite 138
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 27
140% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 88.7
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 0.6
60% 137 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 84%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
3GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 26 18 23 21 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
22% Poor
Read 104
Write 30.8
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 21.4
59% 52 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
26% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 22%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HTH5AN8G6NCJR-VKD 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACR032D Acer V226HQL
Typical H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 3,341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback