Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512FL
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190408
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '23 at 13:55
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Memory 29.8 1-Core 23.7 2-Core 115 28% 56.1 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 201 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1FBE) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	4.52% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 5.9 Parallax 3.2 4% 4.8 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 8.4 5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.52% Great: 6%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,059 Write 777 Mixed 700 187% 845 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 83.9 4K Mixed 26.8 123% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 304 228% 304 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 209%
SanDisk Ultra Luxe 32GB 291 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 134 Write 24.7 Mixed 30.6 59% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 2.8 197% 3 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	36.7% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 13.5 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 256 16% 256 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 30: 0P 5R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
30%	21%	38	38	10	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO21ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	122x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	43x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	110x
GeForce MX250NvidiaBench 14%, 8,806 samples	55x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	58x
KINGSTON RBUSNS8 512GBNvmeBench 125%, 1,404 samples	15x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GBKingstonBench 97%, 7,536 samples	11x

RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBHynixBench 57%, 26,973 samples	61x
M471A1K44BM0-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,088 samples	25x
M471A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GBSamsungBench 60%, 4,290 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16