Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FB_X712FB

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FB_X712FB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X712FB
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190603
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '19 at 17:19
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	20%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 90.7 1-Core 121 2-Core 218 82% 143 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 522 59% 461 Pts	64-Core 533 33% 533 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1E7E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.44% Terrible	Lighting 6.63 Reflection 8.73 Parallax 7.22 5% 7.53 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 6 Splatting 13.6 8% 9.89 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.44% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB 3,311 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 201 198 195 200 206 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 301 Write 261 Mixed 243 SusWrite 200 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 22.5 81% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 240 199% 290 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 141 139 141 142 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 124 Write 136 Mixed 57.1 SusWrite 140 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 0.6 241% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 22.4 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 28.3 SC Mixed 23.2 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FB_X712FB Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FB_X712FB

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	7x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	3x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	6x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	4x

SSD
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	3x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	3x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 512GBNvmeBench 169%, 2,949 samples	2x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	3x
M471A1K44BM0-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,088 samples	3x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GBHynixBench 56%, 4,116 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16