Apple Macmini7,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemApple Macmini7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-35C5E08120C7EEAF
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220418
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 27 '23 at 00:56
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4260U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Memory 19.2
1-Core 28.7
2-Core 44.8
18% 30.9 Pts
4-Core 64.8
8-Core 83
9% 73.9 Pts
64-Core 84.5
5% 84.5 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Apple(106B 0141) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
4% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 8.7
4% 4.87 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 179
Write 106
Mixed 117
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 3.3
11% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
FUJITSU MHY2200BH 200GB
103GB free, PID 0700
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 23
Write 23.7
Mixed 15.2
26% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
18% 0.23 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x483943434E4E4E384A54414C41522D4E5444 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 6
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 0.7
3% 1.17 GB/s
Latency 327
12% 327 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 19 9 60 7.2" 1920 1017 SAM0669 SAMSUNG
Typical Macmini7,1 Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple Macmini7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback