Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 241%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 233%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics230% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive431% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory118.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '23 at 03:10
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$328
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 97.9
1-Core 162
2-Core 320
106% 193 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 1,078
103% 852 Pts
64-Core 1,438
89% 1,438 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Lighting 347
Reflection 300
Parallax 387
283% 345 fps
MRender 379
Gravity 273
Splatting 195
221% 283 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 230%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3201 3226 2199 1797 1787 1793 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
431% Outstanding
Read 3,028
Write 3,353
Mixed 2,984
SusWrite 2,334
660% 2,925 MB/s
4K Read 72.2
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 114
360% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,306
DQ Write 1,150
DQ Mixed 1,212
913% 1,223 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 431%
Great: 526%
T-force TM8FPZ002T 2TB
695GB free
Firmware: EIFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4343 1684 864 1076 1084 1386 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,267
Write 4,283
Mixed 2,408
SusWrite 1,740
606% 2,674 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 62.3
238% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,361
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 433
414% 684 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 305%
Great: 584%
CT4000P3SSD8 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1383 1383 1383 1383 1383 1384 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,218
Write 1,373
Mixed 287
SusWrite 1,383
240% 1,065 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 4
47% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 285
220% 298 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 160%
Great: 426%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$540
742GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 161 162 160 160 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 483
Write 171
Mixed 161
SusWrite 161
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 28.6
118% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 137
121% 184 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 129%
Buffalo SSD-PUTA 2TB
613GB free
Firmware: PMAP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 597 594 396 292 291 292 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 593
Mixed 409
SusWrite 410
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 39.9
139% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 206
184% 273 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZN 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 58.4
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 46
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 33.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 46.3
102% 35.6 GB/s
Latency 46.6
86% 46.6 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 122%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0FA8 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,010 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $802
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback