Micro F7BSC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro F7BSC  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BSC
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '23 at 20:58
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 58.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 327
89% 176 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,067
105% 859 Pts
64-Core 1,592
98% 1,592 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
AMD(1002 0124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.40.03.38
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
49.3% Average
Lighting 55.6
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 91.5
45% 57.2 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 73
Splatting 94.7
57% 65.3 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$65
688GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620281WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2280 2319 1185 984 993 1052 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2595
Write 2,321
Mixed 1,982
SusWrite 1,469
469% 2,092 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 53.6
186% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 698
DQ Write 397
DQ Mixed 733
496% 610 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 275%
Great: 598%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD56S46BS8HA-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
116% Outstanding
MC Read 46.7
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 49.7
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 30.5
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 48.5
114% 40 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 116%
Great: 162%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 75 27" 1280 720 PHLC17B PHL 276E9Q
Typical F7BSC Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Micro F7BSC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback