HP Laptop 17z-cp300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 17z-cp300  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B6D
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '23 at 19:57
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 72.5
1-Core 167
2-Core 325
99% 188 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 776
87% 684 Pts
64-Core 846
52% 846 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8B6D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 28.8
17% 22.6 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 22.6
17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PSELN128GA87MC0 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPE4BP00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 641 824 395 196 206 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1037
Write 890
Mixed 930
SusWrite 396
182% 813 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 49.6
163% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 416
DQ Write 570
DQ Mixed 557
403% 514 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAG56EXNSA051N 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
67.9% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 23.9
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 24.8
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 17.3" 1280 720 BOE0955
Typical Laptop 17z-cp300 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 17z-cp300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback