HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory12.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130909
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 25 '23 at 17:56
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 182
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 500
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 048B) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.09.06
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 8.1
5% 7.4 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 5.8
5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.88%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G3BTND-N210A 256GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 222 194 209 249 250 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 433
Write 248
Mixed 216
SusWrite 222
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 21.8
83% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 189
172% 266 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 82%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
431GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 124 123 123 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
56% Above average
Read 71.3
Write 65.5
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 123
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56%
Great: 87%
Fujitsu HDD 320GB
283GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 76.5
Write 77.5
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 79.5
50% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVT8FP-HYC Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB KVT8FP-HYC Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8C-PB 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 13.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 0P 2R 0G 15B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 22% 78 162 101 60 27.5" 1536 864 SAM0C4E U28E590
Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback