Asus MAXIMUS VIII GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII GENE  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161129
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 25 '23 at 15:43
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 194
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 468
50% 397 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.9% Average
Lighting 53.7
Reflection 52.7
Parallax 56.8
44% 54.4 fps
MRender 56.4
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 46.1
41% 50.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 927
Write 357
Mixed 407
123% 564 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 29.2
111% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 281
234% 351 MB/s
Poor: 109% Great: 220%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
70GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 298 303 308 310 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 405
Write 389
Mixed 375
SusWrite 311
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 35.6
119% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 129%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1.5TB
104GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 565 507 479 182 169 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,488
Write 786
Mixed 491
SusWrite 344
171% 777 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 29.6
97% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 432
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 425
318% 422 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 129%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.1% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 21.8
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 0P 4R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 12% 108 186 10 120 34" 1280 720 AOC3402 U34G2G4R3
Typical MAXIMUS VIII GENE Builds (Compare 1,005 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII GENE - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $719
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback