Asus B85M-K PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus B85M-K PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 20:57
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 186
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 300
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 35
19% 28.9 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 29.2
Splatting 27.5
26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 120 140 175 173 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 388
Write 249
Mixed 262
SusWrite 164
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 24.7
94% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 94.4
DQ Write 36.3
DQ Mixed 60.8
46% 63.8 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 240%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
931GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 119 127 128 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 99.9
Write 52
Mixed 98.8
SusWrite 125
70% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 6.2
771% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$38
796GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 81 82 80 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 80.4
Write 86.2
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 81.1
52% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 46%
Hitachi HUS724030ALA640 3TB
956GB free
Firmware: MF8OAC50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 136 136 133 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 130
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 135
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 94%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
756GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 99 103 105 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 82.2
Write 87.8
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 104
58% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 72%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 144 149 150 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 147
Write 146
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 147
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.9
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 19.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 14 60 18.1" 1280 720 DELA021 DELL 2007FP
Typical B85M-K PLUS Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85M-K PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback