Lenovo 90N900D3AU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90N900D3AU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 317C
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 20:42
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 212
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 702
70% 568 Pts
64-Core 906
56% 906 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
MSI(1462 3852) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.52
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.1% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 72.3
58% 70.9 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 57.8
Splatting 52.2
46% 57.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 62%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 370A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 7.6
5% 7.67 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 12.4
8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ512HALU-000L1 512GB
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 155 143 152 153 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 1,084
Write 288
Mixed 188
SusWrite 156
93% 429 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 42.6
158% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 204
186% 293 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 116%
Great: 203%
T-create T253TA001T 1TB
335GB free
Firmware: S1230A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 422 419 421 419 428 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 486
Write 432
Mixed 405
SusWrite 424
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 26.1
107% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 47.3
98% 196 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 104%
External USB 3.0 2TB
390GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 39 41 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 38.4
Write 40.8
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 39.9
28% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
168% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 107%
ST1000LM 048-2E7172 1TB
603GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 39.1
Write 41
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 41.8
53% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 16GB
3200, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 19.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.6" 1280 720 XXX0000 AAA
Typical 90N900D3AU Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 90N900D3AU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback