Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506II
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 20:09
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 134
2-Core 268
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 765
81% 647 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16DF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.8
Reflection 61.6
Parallax 19.4
12% 31.9 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 16.9
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 996
Write 934
Mixed 866
208% 932 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 50.1
165% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 729
DQ Mixed 399
337% 475 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 185%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
466GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 453
Write 446
Mixed 411
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 46.5
160% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 203
171% 249 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD832A.M16FJ Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 25.5
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 15.5" 1536 864 NCP002D
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II Builds (Compare 444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback