Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER NIRVANA NOTEBOOK
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '17 at 13:58
Run Duration328 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 56
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 60.6
32% 48 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 167
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 9994) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.03
3% 4.02 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.7
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 70
Write 81.9
Mixed 58.9
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.1
33% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 47%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
3GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
5.14% Terrible
Read 20.8
Write 4.39
Mixed 5.86
10% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.82
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.005
18% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.14%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBSQ 830B NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 15.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback