Lenovo 21HRS0E700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 21HRS0E700  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21HRS0E700
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 12:08
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1355U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 57.1
1-Core 198
2-Core 312
99% 189 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 439
68% 488 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 2314) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 19.7
Parallax 18
11% 17 fps
MRender 19.1
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 16.1
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPETJ512MKP1QDQ 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2Q06A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1835 2434 2805 1904 1704 2618 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 1,861
Write 2,157
Mixed 1,464
SusWrite 2,216
435% 1,925 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 43.9
186% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,092
DQ Write 626
DQ Mixed 785
604% 834 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 304%
Great: 304%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G56AK6BX069 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 58.1
MC Mixed 40.8
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 23.9
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 114%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 14" 1296 800 LEN403A
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback